Show full size 924Board.org
Discussion Forum of 924.org
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 Technical FAQ924 FAQ (Technical)   Technical924 Technical Section   Jump to 924.org924.org   Jump to PCA 924 Registry924 Registry

Knock Sensor Location
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> General Discussions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
safe  



Joined: 18 Mar 2017
Posts: 671
Location: Sweden

PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2025 6:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ah, distributor...

You must have some shed-business in the UK who can fix/modify distributors to a desired curve? I Sweden I think everyone that messed with those things have expired....
_________________
/Magnus, Stockholm Sweden
=======================
Porsche 924 -79 NA, EFI and Turbo.
Porsche 931 -79
Porsche 911 -77, 3.2 Targa
Porsche 911 -69, 3.6, Coupe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
924RACR  



Joined: 29 Jul 2001
Posts: 8943
Location: Royal Oak, MI, USA

PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2025 9:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a little more complexity to my maps down low; using ignition timing alone for idle control, like original, works great except for AC switching on... and driveability is excellent... Note that I am running an IC as well as 93 (US) octane - I think this is about like 99 octane in the UK, maybe a touch higher...


_________________
Vaughan Scott
Webmeister
'79 924 #77 SCCA H Prod racecar
'82 931 Plat. Silver
#25 Hidari Firefly P2 sports prototype
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Raize  



Joined: 18 Sep 2013
Posts: 337
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2025 6:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think my fuel quality played a part, apparently it loses octane with storage as well, so mixing 6-month old 99 with an equal proportion of 97 probably results in 97. I certainly don’t remember it knocking audibly except if really abused before putting it away for the winter.

I remember seeing 13.X on the AFR before I backed off. It’s running leaner than it did before winter when I was getting 11.X on boost. Possibly to do with getting rid of the in-tank pump or perhaps just the needle valve that controls the overall AFR is getting gummed up over time.

The control with distributor and k-jet is tricky, but at least I have tools like the knock sensor and the AFR gauge to help. So 31 BTDC without knock is possible at 0.2 bar but with 99+ octane and an EFI-perfect fuel map.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Raize  



Joined: 18 Sep 2013
Posts: 337
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2025 6:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think my fuel quality played a part, apparently it loses octane with storage as well, so mixing 6-month old 99 with an equal proportion of 97 probably results in 97. I certainly don’t remember it knocking audibly except if really abused before putting it away for the winter.

I remember seeing 13.X on the AFR before I backed off. It’s running leaner than it did before winter when I was getting 11.X on boost. Possibly to do with getting rid of the in-tank pump or perhaps just the needle valve that controls the overall AFR is getting gummed up over time.

The control with distributor and k-jet is tricky, but at least I have tools like the knock sensor and the AFR gauge to help. So 31 BTDC without knock is possible at 0.2 bar but with 99+ octane and an EFI-perfect fuel map.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cedric  



Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 2742
Location: Sweden

PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2025 6:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

13s are lean for a boosted car for sure, thats need to be sorted.

My kjet have sat every winter for 6-7months and does pretty much the same AFR year in and year out
_________________
1980 924 Turbo
www.instagram.com/garagecedric/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Raize  



Joined: 18 Sep 2013
Posts: 337
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2025 7:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cedric wrote:
13s are lean for a boosted car for sure, thats need to be sorted.

My kjet have sat every winter for 6-7months and does pretty much the same AFR year in and year out


My k-jet is usually reliable, I think draining the system creates air pockets that mess things up until they dissolve. Hopefully I won’t have to drain it again for a while.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
morghen  



Joined: 21 Jan 2005
Posts: 9044
Location: Romania

PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2025 4:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In my extreme tests for my SC kit while still on kjet, i ran 0.3bar, 6deg BTDC base advance, in 36 deg C ambient temp, AFR as lean as 13.5 on high revs, on 99+ OCT and i didnt detect any knock or see any effects once the engine was opened.

If you got knock at less boost and richer AFR, you either have too much advance or you're heating up the air way more, which can be poor flow, bad charger and so on.

Do you have pictures of your setup?
_________________
Supercharger and EFI kits
https://www.the924.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Raize  



Joined: 18 Sep 2013
Posts: 337
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2025 2:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seems that it was a fuel problem in the end. I adjusted the lower chamber pressure again and now I am getting 11-12 on boost and 14 on cruise. No more red flashing knocklink.

The lock nut on the adjuster was a bit loose so it may have backed off from vibrations.

Once again, wideband O2 sensor is the best thing I have ever bought for this car.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cedric  



Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 2742
Location: Sweden

PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2025 5:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Raize wrote:
Seems that it was a fuel problem in the end. I adjusted the lower chamber pressure again and now I am getting 11-12 on boost and 14 on cruise. No more red flashing knocklink.

The lock nut on the adjuster was a bit loose so it may have backed off from vibrations.

Once again, wideband O2 sensor is the best thing I have ever bought for this car.


Yeah, widebands are incredibly useful, even on a standard euro 931 one or two points of AFR is the difference between a super reliable car you can track all day long or a hole in a piston. Glad you got it working properly !
_________________
1980 924 Turbo
www.instagram.com/garagecedric/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Raize  



Joined: 18 Sep 2013
Posts: 337
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2025 8:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Would it be terrible to run fixed timing (for a given RPM, will still have centrifugal advance obviously) for all levels of boost from 0 PSI up to 13 PSI? This would mean running the retarded timing necessary for it to not detonate at 13 PSI probably turning the distributor back another 10 degrees.

I would also file out the stop on the vacuum canister to allow it to advance 20-25 degrees rather than the 11-12 it currently does. This would give me all my original cruise timing back for economy by -6 PSI vacuum (it advances about 4 degrees per PSI of vacuum as I measured it)...

Thoughts on how much this leaves on the table vs doing it properly with advance being proportionate to boost?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Raize  



Joined: 18 Sep 2013
Posts: 337
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2025 3:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Still knocking, clearly didn’t thrash it hard enough. Biiiig difference between doing some random single gear pulls and properly trying to race someone.

Pulled another 3 degrees. Also my car is still slow as shit, BMW 340i dropped me like I am not even moving. #### pay-to-win modern cars.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cedric  



Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 2742
Location: Sweden

PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2025 6:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Raize wrote:
Still knocking, clearly didn’t thrash it hard enough. Biiiig difference between doing some random single gear pulls and properly trying to race someone.

Pulled another 3 degrees. Also my car is still slow as shit, BMW 340i dropped me like I am not even moving. #### pay-to-win modern cars.


Whats the intake temps when you run it hard, can the IC be underperforming, or the SC running out of breath, or leaking through a bypass valve for example?

Have you checked the fueling per cylinder? Are all injectors delivering the same amount?

If you want the car to be as fast as a 300+hp car you will have to go the turbo way
_________________
1980 924 Turbo
www.instagram.com/garagecedric/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
safe  



Joined: 18 Mar 2017
Posts: 671
Location: Sweden

PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2025 7:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Raize wrote:
.

Pulled another 3 degrees. Also my car is still slow as shit, BMW 340i dropped me like I am not even moving. #### pay-to-win modern cars.


If you want to be quicker than bigger engined cars you need "power under the curve" and superchargers are rubbish at that and turbos are kings.
_________________
/Magnus, Stockholm Sweden
=======================
Porsche 924 -79 NA, EFI and Turbo.
Porsche 931 -79
Porsche 911 -77, 3.2 Targa
Porsche 911 -69, 3.6, Coupe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cedric  



Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 2742
Location: Sweden

PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2025 8:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

safe wrote:
Raize wrote:
.

Pulled another 3 degrees. Also my car is still slow as shit, BMW 340i dropped me like I am not even moving. #### pay-to-win modern cars.


If you want to be quicker than bigger engined cars you need "power under the curve" and superchargers are rubbish at that and turbos are kings.


Screw type supercharges lift the whole curve well, but they arent great for doing it efficiently at higher boost levels(and of course more HP will disapear as drive losses compared to a turbo), so not the best solution to get lots of power from a small displacement. Theres also a massive difference between different type superchargers, if you have a BIG wallet you could call up Harrop in australia and get something really nice, but they cost as much as a car
_________________
1980 924 Turbo
www.instagram.com/garagecedric/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Raize  



Joined: 18 Sep 2013
Posts: 337
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2025 10:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In retrospect I should have gone turbo. There’s nothing wrong now except that it’s still slow. I have headroom to put a 50% bigger crank pulley on but after that I’m basically done.

On paper I thought it would be fast enough but in reality I don’t think so.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> General Discussions All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group