| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Kevin D
Joined: 28 Jul 2005 Posts: 152 Location: Boise, ID
|
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 6:17 am Post subject: air flow mods |
|
|
Can somebody direct me to discussions on air flow mods to the radiator? I've done a few rudimentary searches and found some great discussions on everything but. ..
I have a 931 vented nose and was wondering the consequences of redirecting that air directly to the radiator. It currently just blows into the engine compartment. I currently have the sheet metal off and the mod looks pretty straight forward, but it would not be easy to reverse if it proved to be counter productive.
Currently I run with the needle at 1/2 temp on cool days, 3/4 on hot days (w/ AC). I was hoping to drop that average a bit. _________________ '88 924S 3L 6sp RedRat
'92 Duc 900ss
'02 Duc 998 Carbon
'72 RD 350 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ideola

Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 15550 Location: Spring Lake MI
|
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I have a 931 vented nose and was wondering the consequences of redirecting that air directly to the radiator. |
That's not where I would do airflow mods for the rad. Those vents provide airflow around the turbocharger and exhaust manifold, and quite likely aid in pulling air in thru the NACA duct, which is then exited down past the wastegate under the car.
First thing I would do is run the cooler-range (82C) thermostat and temp switch so that the fan comes on earlier. What I've found is that the stock set up (87C) doesn't cause the fan to kick in early enough in stop and go traffic, and you get into a heat soak situation where you simply can't pull enough heat out of the coolant fast enough. What I've observed is that if you start cooling sooner (by kicking the fan in with the lower range temp sensor), you never get to this point. I have converted all of my 931 motors to this setup, even though it means I get no heat in the winter.
In terms of air flow specifically, the frontal area of the 924/931 under the bumper is already setup quite nicely. What you should really do is create a properly-designed baffle on the front side of the radiator area, as these two diagrams from Maximum Boost illustrate:
It may seem counter intuitive at first, but the opening to the baffle should be smaller than the frontal area of the radiator itself. This design creates a low pressure zone which literally sucks more air into that area. Combined with the high pressure zone in the front of the 924, and the lack of other places for the air to flow, if you put four sided baffle around the rad and angled it down to seal off the area directly below the bumper and sealed up around the lower chin valance, you would have a very nice air induction arrangement. Make sure the baffle is also sealed where it meets up at the rad to prevent any air from being able to escape and go around the rad instead of through it.
You can further complement this setup by increasing the efficiency of the fans on the back side (i.e. more modern, higher efficiency fans as well as improving the sealing and design of the fan shroud...same principle as the front baffle, basically), and reinstalling the engine belly pan. The belly pan has integral louvers which I am convinced are designed to create low pressure zones under the car for the purpose of improving the efficiency of extracting air from the hot engine compartment.
My $.02. More or less. _________________ erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
!tom

Joined: 28 Aug 2006 Posts: 1941 Location: Victoria, BC Canada
|
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm guessing the area of the opening of the baffle should be similar to the area in the radiator that air can travel through, rather than the frontal area of the radiator. _________________ 78 924 NA
5-lug |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ideola

Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 15550 Location: Spring Lake MI
|
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The opening should be SMALLER than the area of the radiator thru which air can pass. I didn't intend to include the end tanks as part of the frontal area, as they are pretty much blocked by the chassis anyway.
This picture sort of illustrates it:
In the above pic, you can see that the bumper obstructs the top half of the rad's heat exchanging surface area. What I would do is construct a baffle that would come from the top of the rad right down to the trailing edge of the bumper. The bottom surface would come from the bottom of the rad out to the trailing edge of the chin valance. And then I would slightly angle the two side pieces to make the opening narrower, as depicted in the Max Boost diagrams above. The outsides of the side pieces would need to be blocked off to prevent any air from going that way, forcing most of the air to be pulled into the inlet or up over the hood. The air is going to take the path of least resistance, so if there is a low pressure zone created by the inlet, that's where most of the air on the frontal section of the car is going to get "sucked" into. A splitter or additional length on the chin valance would probably aid this even further.
Another way to put it is to emulate the opening that they created on the DProd with the "cow catcher" scoop up front. You can see in the following photo how much smaller this opening is than the stock opening above. The chin valance on this setup creates a natural shroud for capturing the air, but more still could be done on my particular car to seal the opening all the way from the valance back to the radiator.
Gary Ambrus had such a setup fabricated for his race car along with a lowered chin valance, but I unfortunately do not have any photos of it. _________________ erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kevin D
Joined: 28 Jul 2005 Posts: 152 Location: Boise, ID
|
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 3:04 pm Post subject: Thanks for the help! |
|
|
Thanks Ideola!
So I'll focus on fabricating the side baffles (top baffle already exactly as you described oem) and building a chin for the beast. That will be my next thread... a search for good home built chin/splitter designs.
Follow up question... I do have the OEM belly pan installed, but I have no hood venting. Any concerns with running the 931 nose without the 931 hood (which pulled even more air in right?)? Should I add some venting in the hood close to the firewall to allow some spillage? Or will that belly pan suck enough hot air out the bottom?
I do have a 931 hood laying around, but then I would have to do some painting .
A couple other details:
It is a '92 3L NA, not a turbo
The exhaust is taped
Original baffle behind bumper that runs to top of radiator intact
Lower temp switch installed
951 radiator installed with tight shroud
AC condensor still there _________________ '88 924S 3L 6sp RedRat
'92 Duc 900ss
'02 Duc 998 Carbon
'72 RD 350 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kevin D
Joined: 28 Jul 2005 Posts: 152 Location: Boise, ID
|
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BTW - that flat-black euro 931 looks very nice. More pics? _________________ '88 924S 3L 6sp RedRat
'92 Duc 900ss
'02 Duc 998 Carbon
'72 RD 350 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
!tom

Joined: 28 Aug 2006 Posts: 1941 Location: Victoria, BC Canada
|
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ideola wrote: | | The opening should be SMALLER than the area of the radiator thru which air can pass. |
I don't think I was clear on what I was saying; I'm guessing the radiator core itself has about 50% or so frontal area blocked by fins etc., so the opening of the baffle would be about 50% the area of the entire radiator core.
...Or is there some other rule of thumb that would apply?
I was under the impression the idea was to get a laminar flow into the radiator core for maximum air flow, and having a big scoop on the front would end up creating too much turbulence. _________________ 78 924 NA
5-lug |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ideola

Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 15550 Location: Spring Lake MI
|
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@Kevin
Yes, I think you need to consider some means of extracting the additional air pressure that you are now allowing into the engine compartment. I'm not sure the NACA duct will do that, as it's more designed to draw air in, although some have hypothesized that it also is designed to vent air out while at a standstill. In your case, it is the high pressure air that is put there at speed that you need to extract, and 931 NACA duct hood isn't the right tool for that job.
I'm not familiar with the undertray on the late 944. Does it have louvers, or is it a solid piece? If it's a solid piece, then I think you need to add some extraction vents (louvers) somewhere: either on the underbelly or on the hood. Or you could go really radical and build a monster extraction vent for your stacked AC condensor / radiator similar to the one Bass GT built for his front mount intercooler:
Note the lip at the leading edge of the extraction vent in the above pic to create a low pressure effect for aiding in the extraction. Steve's vent mimics the one used on the rare 968 turbos, as well as famous race cars like the GTt40. I've seen this approach implemented as well on the frontal heat exchangers (oil and air units) on 911s.
More pix of my 931 Club Sport here with build thread here.
@!tom
Yes, I think you're on to something there. _________________ erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
v8carreragts

Joined: 05 Sep 2003 Posts: 665 Location: Tucson, AZ
|
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2013 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Another area to look at for relieving under hood pressure is the sides of the front fenders between the door and wheel well. Something like the extractors used on the 2nd gen Trans Am (70-81) If you look at those, you will see that the leading edge is raised as well. This created a low pressure area at the opening helping to pull air out of the engine compartment.
It doesn't help much to increase the air entering the engine compartment without adding a place to let the air out.
I have most of the front area open to the radiator on my car which includes the turbo front panel and the GTS front bumper. You would be hard pressed trying to get close to the area of the radiator on these cars. I also removed the cross member and replaced it with a new piece that does not block as much flow. The radiator will also be sealed to the opening. I also intend to build side extractors to aid in venting the engine compartment. _________________ 84 944--924 Carrera GTS clone w/520HP Chevy 302 V8--RUNNING!
2015 AUDI Q7
2013 Dodge Charger R/T AWD HEMI
2013 Chevy Cruze |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|